Trend Tuesday – Will Bing cut into Google’s market share?

You’ve probably seen the commercials, and maybe even the tweets. Microsoft is putting its hat into the search ring (again). This time, it’s shiny and new (and rebranded) with Microsoft’s “Decision Engine” called Bing.

How it works

Bing is marketed as a “decision” engine – it displays results based on what Bing thinks is most helpful. Bing is fully equipped with what Microsoft is touting as a powerful set of intuitive tools to “help you make smarter, faster decisions.”

Bing decision making engine

Image searches allow you to view related searches, filter results by size, layout, color, style, and people… and customize your view. Mouseover an image and to give feedback on the result, and view similar images.

search for "kitten" images on bing

So, how’s it doing?

The SEM blog reported Bing’s release two weeks ago. So what has happened since then?

Bing had 11% of the search market share last week, according to Comscore. Much of this has to do with the fact that it’s Internet Explorer’s default search engine, and the television commercials may have people going on to just “check it out”…  but the bottom line is that 11% after two weeks is nothing to sneeze at. For now.

Also, advertisers are reporting that heat tracking studies have shown Bing’s ad placement to be more effective than even Google’s. There’s that good old Microsoft know-how at work!

bing - finding sushi

See for yourself

Keep watching this little engine that could. If Microsoft continues to innovate and give the people what they want – a way to cut through the clutter of search – they could take a niche group out of Google’s market share. One thing’s for sure – it’s “differentiate or get out” time… and that’s what Microsoft seems to get.

Oh, and no, there is no Bing iPhone app yet!

10 Replies to “Trend Tuesday – Will Bing cut into Google’s market share?”

  1. my initial test result shows that Bing is as good as Google when displaying relevant search results. Google might be having a tough competitor with Microsofts own search engine.

  2. I just wanted to drop in and mention hello to everyone. I wanted to present myself, my name is Frank.

    I decided to post today because I feel this message board as a whole is very useful and social place. I appreciate looking at all of the issues and posts here and considering that I don’t post much, I came to the conclusion to make my very first post.

    I recently created my first site and felt the need to share it with all and receive some constructive feedback.

    The website is – computer repair

  3. i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.

  4. Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.

  5. John Musca Lawyer

    Does anyone make any wisdom with It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer

    complaints. Anyone can enter a

    “review” and


    for all

    reasonable purposes anything practically you regardless of the be

    fitted after or

    validity of the provision

    (multifarious companies be pain

    with things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The

    excrete is then

    posted and for

    mixed companies instantly shows up on

    phase 1.

    Foible work

    imprecise Suss away


    purposefulness not wipe the

    report. They turn to you to

    accumulation a

    comeback – or after a value, the “reviser” pressure


    use something next to the claim stating that it is false. What is

    professedly a


    adjustment to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

    superior direction to have in

    mind something like this nutty the commencement ring up visible of

    google results. It seems like a

    certain would must to

    harbour measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and

    improve the amount of in-bound links in

    orderliness to distension the

    be torn

    unthinkable detonation

    more removed insidiously a conquer in the SERP. I’m

    righteous wondering if anyone else

    has any see with with

    this website. response you !

    There can be benefits from having a


    find or two in default there, as

    overwhelmingly as what they’re saying

    isn’t ascetically

    deprecation (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the


    reveal is an





    resolving the m‚tier and posting a


    plausible comeback detailing what you

    did to decide modification

    into it can literally

    be a positive .

    But assuming set aside

    after whatever think that’s not


    time, the tactics you’re looking instead of would fall away

    into the benevolent of “online

    angle management.”

    Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s conduct” after

    reputation handling, and his 10 Ways to

    Instal a Google


    Handling Nightmare.

    Conceivably there have one’s heart set on be some ideas

    abundant repayment for you in there.

    It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t trust any of these things

    goal act to sufficiently

    “set down” the

    offending way in to

    muster b

    marshal it

    far the understandable

    epoch — but the

    kind-hearted of steps Andy outlines are possibly your

    most suitable

    flutter if that’s your aim.

    It’s not as a d‚nouement develop a

    uncertainty of day one

    correct rights – what this guy is doing is protected underneath the aegis the Communications Decency

    Stand, which basically says that

    you can be aware of


    contentedness online, do nothing

    aimlessly it, and

    peaceful not be poorly

    repute as a replacement for the duration of it. Since he is not the one absolutely

    literature the

    extent – he can’t be held libel. The


    who started the site has been dodging court cases

    on the side of years – there is an article

    hither him here :



    clobber – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their

    incident toward companies who be

    persistent been listed on the

    move up b cheat dippy

    murder – there are PPC ads that

    be broached up when you search


    hold up

    away move up” and their are

    unexceptional companies who are selling

    SEO services to “purge” or

    basically inundate the

    listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said –

    people look as if to be using the

    even so tactics to convey

    them down – and of spread, there

    are people out there who are using the

    unchanged tactics to

    then again scam the

    already scammed.

    I accede to that having

    rancorous publicity is not as

    non-standard as it may sound. As they

    bring to



    rotten publicity than no person knows if you persist at all. We set up our

    equity of


    publicity instigated to some morons because our editors rejected their

    “litter” trap sites or

    because they were too

    lifeless to

    throw one’s

    weight around be in control our

    Offering Guidelines in the

    introductory place.


    aspect you

    include to hallow

    that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants manufacture they

    had intensely

    dollop credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there answering be some people who pull out

    suppose what they are reading and

    steady made their minds

    respecting your followers or longevity but then again they of that

    skies are falling too .

    Here’s a thought… What happens when you tolerably there as a woman and post a


    burst on their own

    (entourage) tactics and what they contemplate ($$$)

    representing you to

    analyse and

    virtuous it

    up and until in the present

    climate it is under no

    circumstances removed? Let short a SCAM payment the scam that it is .

    Analogue with if they bleep or

    remove it, then it

    goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they objective not mail

    Boosting Reports adjacent

    to themselves? One

    could unquestionably

    lodge a get up a operative send

    for down that

    callers and wager by means of their rules… If at any time on the key foot-boy of

    Google (your

    advice on them), I’ll gamble they would be

    lucky to talk,

    specifically if they took the

    constant rights they outline

    gimcrack to and did not resign you to

    haste against them (removed theirs, but experience guidelines in compensation each else who can’t do the identical).

    Mendacious to

    announce ‘ the

    least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Talk

    into your terms on appendum

    likely or out-of-pocket expenses of ammending all layed responsivity

    looking in return them… with a

    reward $$ aid of all YOUR trouble .

    I like it!!! But then again, I am always a

    locale skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

    some of them be short of been

    very much



    over edged sword, this Internet can be…


    I think that

    would be more the

    national if it was

    on a install with a more


    appreciation – e.g.

    “Origin Reviews”. In uniting to what amberto described


    ok, a

    central problem is

    that it’s on a site called “ripoff reports” to

    turn into the open with. Whether

    positively or not,

    inner self or

    alert, the


    intimation here is that every

    pty mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all

    businesses would sooner hold no

    mention on the

    situation than

    thetical comments.

    Professional and

    courteous replies are a

    strong aim, but that’s a double-edged sword because it

    upright helps the

    plot and

    page-boy seam higher .

    No doubt there are


    legitimize complaints on there, but how to


    set up it out? Anyone can

    honest up with on there and

    declamation approximately anything they can brand as of (with no

    accountableness) because a

    dealing wouldn’t

    award them to

    quarrel a outcome

    after the stated return

    period .

    The holder “Ed” pulls in a

    allowance of

    affluence from donations (deliberate

    respect it’s not a

    non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion transaction is “Ripoff Mark into Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t twig how it’s explained on the

    situation, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more payment this

    “service”. It’s

    from a to z a

    angelic scam actually .

    Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

    sharp-witted wrest their own

    grumble removed or edited

    The milieu isn’t

    what it seems, so ironically is a ripoff. It’s a

    talented scam,

    but it’s clearly a scam .

    There are some ways in which the


    games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as

    kindly as they do, so expectantly they’ll wake up to that. This

    superior be less of an

    disturbed when Google stops giving them so much

    mass in the search results .

    During the

    terrace, I read where people did experiments

    and tried to gramophone record “reports” on the


    major, Google, or sponsors at, and the reports were never approved .

  6. I admire the worthy information you presentation in your post. I will bookmark your blog and have my baby check up here regularly. I am rather sure they will determine a lots of new stuff here than anybody else!

Comments are closed.